The way I see it people flocked to our alliance because they could not survive due to your ballooned size. We were small for a day or so until people realized they had no chance. I almost perferred it when goh vi and ai were seperated...gave the impression of a fighting chance...damn what other alliances came in 3 parts....
AI's "ballooned size"? You do realise AI have been 20-30 members every round for 3 years now right?
AI's "ballooned size"? You do realise AI have been 20-30 members every round for 3 years now right?
Ah so similiar to wto, you don't get outside your own group and socilize. And last round was a pretty poor attempt btw... not really an attempt at all, just masking your behavior. Any other ways you resemble them?... though I will say you talk.
Ai was formed back in the day (2008ish I wanna say??? been a while) when there were not only giant alliances, but many of them. Natives, TLI, NAOAW, AI, 3rd and WTO all had at least 20+ members, sometimes up to 40. We had other alliances (Vulture, Misfits, Band Of Brothers, JPF etc) with anywhere from 8-15 members.
Back then, AI started as a medium sized alliance that took no bull****, hardly ever NAPed, and encouraged all their members to fight and never lay down and take it on the chin. Over time, as players began having their butts handed to them in the battlefield, a few like-minded players ended up becoming friends with AI members and the alliance grew. We talk a lot out of the game as well as in our alliance page, we're like-minded and encourage each other to have fun.
I share your sentiments cook, and you're probably right. However this is the reason why there are so many people in AI still, when the other big alliances from history have crumbled away (in fact, AI picked up some refugees from old alliances). Raging is right when he says AI is a symptom of the core problems with the game, not the actual problem. Most of our members have been playing a while and we know where we belong. It just sucks that there arent 3-4 other alliances similar in size.
Ai was formed back in the day (2008ish I wanna say??? been a while) when there were not only giant alliances, but many of them. Natives, TLI, NAOAW, AI, 3rd and WTO all had at least 20+ members, sometimes up to 40. We had other alliances (Vulture, Misfits, Band Of Brothers, JPF etc) with anywhere from 8-15 members.
Back then, AI started as a medium sized alliance that took no bull****, hardly ever NAPed, and encouraged all their members to fight and never lay down and take it on the chin. Over time, as players began having their butts handed to them in the battlefield, a few like-minded players ended up becoming friends with AI members and the alliance grew. We talk a lot out of the game as well as in our alliance page, we're like-minded and encourage each other to have fun.
I share your sentiments cook, and you're probably right. However this is the reason why there are so many people in AI still, when the other big alliances from history have crumbled away (in fact, AI picked up some refugees from old alliances). Raging is right when he says AI is a symptom of the core problems with the game, not the actual problem. Most of our members have been playing a while and we know where we belong. It just sucks that there arent 3-4 other alliances similar in size.
Pb had the balls to start an alliance with albiet similiar princials, but looked outside thebox and invited people, yourself included, that are not normally on this side. Hollowcost did the same thing with red dawn last round by inviting pb and I. Red dawn was really fun to fight with, and this round is shaping up the same with peter principal
Ah so similiar to wto, you don't get outside your own group and socilize. And last round was a pretty poor attempt btw... not really an attempt at all, just masking your behavior. Any other ways you resemble them?... though I will say you talk.
Step 3: realise when you're talking using someone else's words rather than your own.
Pretty much...yours, where do you think I would come up with such rantings. I really don't want to start hunting your old posts to quote you. I think you had a whole thread dedicated to bad mouthing wto for their size and lack of sociability.
Pretty much...yours, where do you think I would come up with such rantings. I really don't want to start hunting your old posts to quote you. I think you had a whole thread dedicated to bad mouthing wto for their size and lack of sociability.
And the true agenda becomes clear. Thanks, nice to see some good ol' fashioned provocation still works now and again on here.
I'll leave you to believe whatever Peolaomeo tells you, however there's always two sides to a coin.
Linear Mode
