Is it ok to have a thread giving feedback on the new server please?
If it is then I for me the game has certainly got slower viz a v the refresh rate of each and every page.
Also, is it my imagination or is it running really really slow? "your army will arrive at x" is longer in actual time than the displatyed time. ie 10 mins for me seems to be 15 mins.
Maybe the two go hand in hand. Maybe it's a settling in thing.
I've noticed that the speed is about the same as the old provider most of the time, but then I see a hiccup and things start to load slower. I also noticed that the militia have no name so that script may not be completing correctly.
"Maybe he should join another alliance and learn how to play this game instead of always moaning about the better players..." -King_Diamond
For me again it's really fast. But so was the previous server. Perhaps because I live so close to where it is located?
Technically it would also be impossible for a quad core server to be slower than a double core server. So if it for some is, then something else is up.
Funny, my mate who owns a computer company would disagree about the quad core/double core arguement.
I wonder if it's a browser thing.
I use firefox 5. I know datafly says he uses google chrome and never has speed probs ?
"Technically it would also be impossible for a quad core server to be slower than a double core server."
Ok that is untrue. If you are saying...
Technically it would also be impossible for This quad core server to be slower than a double core server."
It might be true.
But saying a server is a quad and there for faster than a duel is crap. One might be one gig and one might be 8 gig.
You need to make more of a comparison than just a quad and a duel... same chipset yes but a 2006 quad will get blown away by a 2011 duel...