Scoring System Based on City Value - GEWar
GEWar

Go Back   GEWar > GEWar > GEWar Support > Feature Suggestions

Feature Suggestions If you have an idea on how we can improve GEwar, post it here!

Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2011, 12:08 AM
GEnie_wieder_war GEnie_wieder_war is offline
GEnie_wieder_war is The Jean GEnie
Mercenary
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
Scoring System Based on City Value

I would like to introduce a new scoring system based on city value. It won't have to replace the old one based on killed hitpoints, but it would be a valuable addition. (We had two different systems at the same time before, this shouldn't be too complicated.)

My idea:
Every player gets his current city value as a score every 5minutes/hour/12hours/day (it depends on the speed of the server - the game should not become too slow by this). A player's total score is just the sum of these scores. (Maybe devided by 1,000,000 to avoid too large numbers )

This should encourage fighting from the beginning: Owning a city on the first day of the reset gives you just as many points as on the last day...
Sit back and save won't lead to the top: Savers might still be able to conquer half of the world three days before reset, but that won't generate enough points to "win" the game. ( I know what I'm talking about: This way I usually show up on the top list every end of a round... )

Coming feature: If industry is reintroduced, it would just fit nicely into this scoring system.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2011, 12:32 AM
HouseOfRothschild's Avatar
HouseOfRothschild HouseOfRothschild is offline
HouseOfRothschild is bringing peace to GEWar.
Admiral
 

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Havana, Cuba
Posts: 620
Likes: 5
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
This sounds like a good idea to me. As long as, just like you mentioned, we also keep the HP score ranking system as well. It gives different styled players a goal to aspire for.

I have not done much city holding to be honest, although I plan to give it a go next round, so I am not sure how much action city holding gets other than "take city, lose or defend city, retake when lost". One thing about being a fresh-faced whippersnapper around these parts that I know for certain is that I have a currently insatiable blood lust for battle, which leads me to seeking out cities to wipe out, rather than occupy. I am rather impatient right now to wait for the battles to come to me. So please keep the HP ranking system as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2011, 01:17 AM
ghetto bob's Avatar
ghetto bob ghetto bob is offline
ghetto bob is Mr. Double Standard
YourMotherWasAHampster
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,472
Likes: 43
Liked 94 Times in 57 Posts
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
owning a city worth less than the divisor would be a detriment to a players score wouldn't it?
__________________
"War is young men killing other young men they do not know on the orders of old men who know one another too well."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2011, 01:27 AM
ghetto bob's Avatar
ghetto bob ghetto bob is offline
ghetto bob is Mr. Double Standard
YourMotherWasAHampster
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,472
Likes: 43
Liked 94 Times in 57 Posts
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
not a detriment as much as not being worth owning, sure you'll get your .000005 points every cron run for owning Alert, Canada but it will take 200,000 cron runs to earn 1 point.
__________________
"War is young men killing other young men they do not know on the orders of old men who know one another too well."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2011, 01:52 AM
GEnie_wieder_war GEnie_wieder_war is offline
GEnie_wieder_war is The Jean GEnie
Mercenary
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghetto bob View Post
owning a city worth less than the divisor would be a detriment to a players score wouldn't it?
No, of course not. The divisor has no influence of the score at all, it would only be there for optical reasons: We would encounter large numbers like 118,247,376,554 and 97,386,356,298 which are difficult to compare (you may find yourself counting the digits first ). 118,247 and 97,386 can be interpreted more easily.

Although on second sight I would say using the logarithm here would even do a better job.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2011, 02:02 AM
ghetto bob's Avatar
ghetto bob ghetto bob is offline
ghetto bob is Mr. Double Standard
YourMotherWasAHampster
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,472
Likes: 43
Liked 94 Times in 57 Posts
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
there has to be a mechanism that makes owning small cities worth the effort
__________________
"War is young men killing other young men they do not know on the orders of old men who know one another too well."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2011, 02:17 AM
GEnie_wieder_war GEnie_wieder_war is offline
GEnie_wieder_war is The Jean GEnie
Mercenary
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghetto bob View Post
there has to be a mechanism that makes owning small cities worth the effort
There can be added a fixed value to each city, similar to the calculation of the city income.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-03-2011, 02:28 AM
ghetto bob's Avatar
ghetto bob ghetto bob is offline
ghetto bob is Mr. Double Standard
YourMotherWasAHampster
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,472
Likes: 43
Liked 94 Times in 57 Posts
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
That's been the constant problem with using city value to help calculate score. If you can come up with an equation that makes sense then I'm sure it would be considered.
__________________
"War is young men killing other young men they do not know on the orders of old men who know one another too well."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2011, 03:05 AM
GEnie_wieder_war GEnie_wieder_war is offline
GEnie_wieder_war is The Jean GEnie
Mercenary
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
The equation would be:

S=V+N*F

with S = score
V = city value
N = number of owned cities
F = fixed value [100,000 ... 1,000,000]

Determining F will put emphasis either on owning high valued cities (F~100,000) or on owning many cities (F~1,000,000).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-03-2011, 04:00 AM
Jeff Lebowski Jeff Lebowski is offline
Jeff Lebowski is retired
Donator
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: somewhere
Posts: 280
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Jeqq Submit to Spurl
Quote:
Originally Posted by GEnie_wieder_war View Post
I would like to introduce a new scoring system based on city value. It won't have to replace the old one based on killed hitpoints, but it would be a valuable addition. (We had two different systems at the same time before, this shouldn't be too complicated.)

My idea:
Every player gets his current city value as a score every 5minutes/hour/12hours/day (it depends on the speed of the server - the game should not become too slow by this). A player's total score is just the sum of these scores. (Maybe devided by 1,000,000 to avoid too large numbers )

This should encourage fighting from the beginning: Owning a city on the first day of the reset gives you just as many points as on the last day...
Sit back and save won't lead to the top: Savers might still be able to conquer half of the world three days before reset, but that won't generate enough points to "win" the game. ( I know what I'm talking about: This way I usually show up on the top list every end of a round... )

Coming feature: If industry is reintroduced, it would just fit nicely into this scoring system.

Stop reading my thoughts!

Seriously, this is one of the biggest changes that I see as "necessary". My idea involves more factors then just city income, but city income, value, attacks/defense and killed HPs are all figured into the equation.
__________________
"Maybe he should join another alliance and learn how to play this game instead of always moaning about the better players..." -King_Diamond
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39 PM.