View Full Version : Anon nukes


AK-7
01-12-2006, 06:11 PM
How about making nukes anonymous, or maybe making that an option for an additional fee? Not only is it more realistic (if one had a nuke, it would be possible in the real world to bring it almost anywhere) but it would also make it more interesting. You could take credit for nukes you didn't launch to indimidate your opponents or deny that you did launch one.

Or perhaps make it anonymous for as long as the radiation stays, then when the first army occupies it, that army analyses the residue and identifies the launcher(but only to the person who got into the city first). Thus it's not totally anonymous, but it's not immediately knowable to everyone. If you managed to be the first army into the city you nuked, you could even blame someone specific for it.

p0wderfinger
01-12-2006, 06:19 PM
if one had a nuke, it would be possible in the real world to bring it almost anywhere.
Yeah, I've been meaning to mail my member of parliament about border security these days. :p


Or perhaps make it anonymous for as long as the radiation stays, then when the first army occupies it, that army analyses the residue and identifies the launcher.
Now there's realism for ya. :D

hixthebeast
01-12-2006, 07:48 PM
i think it sounds like a good idea! will add even more crazyness to the game!! hehe:p

Entropy
01-12-2006, 08:44 PM
You think thats crazy? Wait till we implement MIRV warheads on our nukes! If you're gonna take out a city, why not take a few other surrounding ones down while you're at it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIRV

:evil

birq
01-12-2006, 11:43 PM
You think thats crazy? Wait till we implement MIRV warheads on our nukes! If you're gonna take out a city, why not take a few other surrounding ones down while you're at it?

Crazier still, anyone remember Rise of the Triad? There was a missle launcher that fired what they called Drunk Missiles -- it would go off in the general direction of your choosing, but you never knew where it would go from there. That was fun.

p0wderfinger
01-13-2006, 12:03 AM
If we have nukes, why not ion cannons? How about my alliance gets Ion Cannon attacks instead of nukes?

axio
01-13-2006, 12:29 AM
or a chemical missile, eats the troops away slowly without them noticing as much (hehe good ol tib sun)