What about the ability to start an army in any alliance member's home base? This would give a real tactical reason to belong to an alliance.

What about the ability to start an army in any alliance member's home base? This would give a real tactical reason to belong to an alliance.

I think perhaps it would be equally if not a greater tactica; advantage to create armies in one's own city. Perhaps that person should even own the city for say two days.

I think perhaps it would be equally if not a greater tactica; advantage to create armies in one's own city. Perhaps that person should even own the city for say two days.

That would work, if you can hold a city for two days you should be able to create armies in it. Anywhere you can create an army your alliance members should be able to create an army too.

Being able to create an army in another alliance members city, would give up the need for travel.

A nice thought though, I can see just to many problems with extending the idea in that direction.

I think perhaps it would be equally if not a greater tactica; advantage to create armies in one's own city. Perhaps that person should even own the city for say two days.
This will not be needed when we are able to slit/merge our armies.

True, did not think of it that way. Good point.

Being able to create an army in another alliance members city, would give up the need for travel.

A nice thought though, I can see just to many problems with extending the idea in that direction.

Also it's not realistic. Australia and America are allies. But America can't raise an army in Sydney.........But a BIG support here for merging and splitting armies and creating new armies from cities with stable (2 day) ownership.

my 2 geos