Luke
01-04-2006, 08:26 PM
We might need some extra cities Blitz :p
An extra 500 would do just fine :)
An extra 500 would do just fine :)
|
View Full Version : New Cities Luke 01-04-2006, 08:26 PM We might need some extra cities Blitz :p An extra 500 would do just fine :) zinc 01-04-2006, 11:31 PM Yes, yes!, YES! *101 posts!* YamuN 01-05-2006, 12:22 AM *drools* hehe :cool: araT 01-05-2006, 06:31 AM We might need some extra cities Blitz :p An extra 500 would do just fine :) Mmmmm.. 500 is a bit slim luke, we did get 1600 new members overnight.. I was thinking closer to 1000 new cities ;) T. Luke 01-05-2006, 06:33 AM Mmmmm.. 500 is a bit slim luke, we did get 1600 new members overnight.. i was thinking closer to 1000 new cities ;) T. I don't know what i was thinking...ofcourse...you are so right. 1000 extra should be the new goal of today. ronnielim 01-05-2006, 06:35 AM 1000~~!!! got to buy more armies now.... :shoot how about an atlantic city... cannot be seen in the GE...keke :D Blitzkrieg 01-05-2006, 10:02 AM Lukas been placed Blitzkrieg 01-05-2006, 10:03 AM Lukas has been placed on the "ignore list" :sealed :cool: p0wderfinger 01-05-2006, 10:28 AM 1000~~!!! got to buy more armies now.... :shoot how about an atlantic city... cannot be seen in the GE...keke :D Are you talking about Atlantis? I actually had a suggestion about that. It could be a bonus city. But yes, we seriously need a buttload of new cities or else there'll be some hell to pay, I fear. araT 01-05-2006, 10:47 AM Lukas has been placed on the "ignore list" :sealed :cool: Hahahahaha aww :cool: T. axio 01-06-2006, 04:40 AM perhaps adding small towns would help, and reduce the city limits? just as a way to help the small guys out so they can start on something that isnt worth much to the more powerful players/alliances. Blaman 01-06-2006, 04:57 AM would it be possible to introduce towns for people to take over, but have them as a starting block. a person can only have a max of 500 troops at a town. the more toops you have, the less the town earns cause people are unhappy with the number of troops.. someone can attack the town with more than 500, but if they win, it costs like 100geos per 100 troops over 500 that are in the town.. ie: a massive penalty for having more than 500 troops at a town. maybe owning 3+ cities makes you unable to control any more than 10 towns... that way you dont have a 'super power' owning anything. If you guys do go ahead with something like the above... adding new cities/towns/places to conqure, perhaps members of the community would be good enough to add some places (and co-ords) from their country/local area to make the job easier and better for everyone? axio 01-06-2006, 05:16 AM yeh, just look at this little city, its only gives 6.2 geos a day. but there are EIGHT armies on the way to it. http://www.gewar.net/war/city.php?city=368 ARX 01-06-2006, 05:27 AM Everybody looooves a free city! :p :cheesy p0wderfinger 01-08-2006, 08:39 AM would it be possible to introduce towns for people to take over, but have them as a starting block. a person can only have a max of 500 troops at a town. the more toops you have, the less the town earns cause people are unhappy with the number of troops.. someone can attack the town with more than 500, but if they win, it costs like 100geos per 100 troops over 500 that are in the town.. ie: a massive penalty for having more than 500 troops at a town. maybe owning 3+ cities makes you unable to control any more than 10 towns... that way you dont have a 'super power' owning anything. If you guys do go ahead with something like the above... adding new cities/towns/places to conqure, perhaps members of the community would be good enough to add some places (and co-ords) from their country/local area to make the job easier and better for everyone? Well because of troop upkeep, you ARE earning less money by having more troops in town. Personally if I were a citizen of said town, I'd be happier for the increased safety. Also the way the game mechanics work, most "super powers" don't actually own tiny towns because it becomes unworthwhile to fight all the newbies who are competing for them. V_Oda 01-09-2006, 11:09 AM Hi Luke! Do Blitz stop to create cities? We need more cities! toiletduck 01-09-2006, 11:33 AM i think to start off and be fair everyone should start with ONE city that no one can attack and as new cities are made people can vacate their city to go after the new one or keep their original and try to get the new one, either way the new one is up for grabs by anyone, and if you keep original and go after second and win second then either city can be attacked. but it would suck working out who gets high valued cities and who gets low valued cities. maybe a new feature could be starting them all off equal and within a city you have to fund police education and so on and try to get the city value up that way. Blitzkrieg 01-09-2006, 12:03 PM Hi Luke! Do Blitz stop to create cities? We need more cities! I'll have a flurry then let the dust settle, otherwise everyone will be just refreshing the unoccupied city list and noone will be attacking each other. There will be more cities coming up. Priority being where ever I see there being a lack. Blitzkrieg 02-11-2006, 10:17 PM Send me to the grinder, Orion! |